Lire pdf La révolution Holacracy Auteur Brian J. Robertson – shelving–for–Livres.co.uk
Ctually the city metaphore made me give it a deeper thought Anyway even if I agree with many statements even if I ve made plenty of bookmarks got inspired to write at least few blog posts I think that YES Holocracy may work but only if ou start it from scratch of within a really small company And author did literally nothing to convince me I m wrong he s uite good in presenting the pros of Holocracy but there s barely any mention of potential risks that can happen decision paralysis within governance process gaps in processes in context of contradicting positions of circle s members potential slowness of decision making progress VETOersetcWhat did I like most short idea about dealing with compensation in Holocracy powered org sadly there should be many ideas about adapting traditional enterprise mechanics into flat world but they are not here some VERY good points about empowerment in different work scenariosAnyway I think that if Rocker (Chateau Babylon Book 1) you re interested in managementou should definitely read this book Not necessarily because it s that good or because everybody will be doing Holocracy by next Tuesday but just to make our own opinion on this interesting topic Holacracy is a governance system and a registered trademark owned by HolacracyOne The word Holacracy is very easy to confuse with holocracy with an o which means universal democracy Robertson s aim with the system is to harness the tremendous sensing power of the human consciousness available to our organizations p 7 This harnessing is done by a set of core rules p 12 The Holacracy constitution acts as the core rule book for the organization p 21 Robertson hopes that his readers will approach the book not as a set of ideas principles or philosophies but as a guide to a new practice Pp 13 14Brian Robertson S 13 14Brian Robertson s is very readable and informative
i share robertson s view on the problems share Robertson s view on the problems with predict and control p 7 and his interest in finding better ways to work together p 12 but I can also see problems with heavily rule based approaches I think there s a fundamental difference between following rules and honoring agreements Rules are externally focused while agreements are internal because they are directly linked to will Agreements not rules are the glue that ties commitment to resultsBrian Robertson focuses on practices in his book while my interest primarily is on principles This doesn t mean that I think practices are unimportant I share *however ralph waldo emerson s view that the *Ralph Waldo Emerson s view that The who grasps principles can successfully select his own methods The man who tries methods ignoring principles is sure to have trouble To paraphrase Emerson the man who focus on rules and processes ignoring principles is sure to have trouble I also think that processes need to grow or evolve from their specific context Each situation is uniue in some way small or largeFor Brian Robertson it s very important to prevent others from claiming power over ou p 21 This is done by establishing a core authority structure and a system that empowers everyone p 21 The power is in the process which is defined in detail p 21 For me harnessing true self organization and agility throughout an enterprise p 20 is an oxymoron a contradiction in terms Harnessing self organization might actually kill it I suspect people might decide to withdraw their engagement if they realize that they are harnessed for the benefit of the organization onlyBrian Robertson defines a circle not as a group of people but as a group of roles p 48 The basic circle structure consists of nested circles p 47 Robertson calls the hierarchy of nested circles a holarchy p 46 Arthur Koestler defines a holon as a whole that is a part of a larger whole and a holarchy as the connection between holons p 38 I d challenge that a hierarchy of nested circles really is a holarchy A person certainly is a holon but I doubt that a role in itself is a holon What inherent wholeness does a role have if people are needed to energize the role and enact its accountabilities p 43 Having said that I do think that a group of people can become and act as a holon under certain circumstances Maybe Bohmian Dialogue the U process and Open Space Technology are examples when such circumstances can occurThe nested circles in the basic circle structure are linked via two special roles the Lead and Rep Links p 49 The idea behind this interlinking of cir. E prendre des décisions en fonction de la nature de leur travail leurs rôles et non de leur titre leur poste Il en résulte Le management traditionnel Des réunions pénibles déstructurées ou peu structurées Une structure organisationnelle rigide Une conception organisationnelle axée sur le PDG Les managers sont des freins à la prise de dé. .
Download ó PDF, DOC, TXT or eBook Â Brian J. Robertson.
Cles comes from the Sociocratic Circle Organization Method Sociocracy which was invented by Gerard Endenburg in the 1970s Brian Robertson tried to patent the idea Pub No US2009006113 A1 Fig 4 but subseuently abandoned the patent application Other ideas in the patent application similar to Sociocracy are the decision making Fig 6 governance meeting Fig 8 and role election Fig 9 processes A significant difference Between Sociocracy And Holacracy Is That All Roles Are Elected Sociocracy and Holacracy is that all roles are elected Sociocracy while only the Rep Link Facilitator and Secretary are elected roles in Holacracy p 57 Holacracy is also prescriptive The responsibility of people in a Holacracy is to act as role fillers This is a sacred duty and an act of love and service not for Déjate llevar (Spanish Edition) your own sake but nonetheless ofour own free will p 85 Holacracy empowers The Southern Woman New and Selected Fiction you to useour own best judgment to energize Perundang Undangan Madjapahit your role and doour work p 97 I cannot help but wonder why people can t empower themselves Why do Tumors of the Uterine Corpus and Trophoblastic Diseases you need the permission of a system to useour own best judgment in The Santas Gift your workIn addition to the basic responsibility as role fillers people also have specific duties in offering transparency processing reuests and accepting certain rules of prioritization p 92 Transparency and effectiveness are important in Sociocracy too However euivalence doesn t seem to be as important in Holacracy as in Sociocracy In Holacracy the process is all that matters and the process will take care of everything else p 111 The rules in Holacracy create a sacred space that frees each of us to act as sensors for the organization without drama getting in the way p 110 As long as the process is honoredou really don t care how anyone feels at least not in Commentatio de feminarum in graviditate mutationibus nec non de causis uibus fiat ut integra earum valetudo cum hisce mutationibus consistat your role as facilitator p 110 I ask myself aren t feelings important if people are going to be able to act as sensors The answer Brian Robertson gives is that it s about processing tensions for the sake of our roles which ultimately serve the organization s purpose p 113 This keeps the organization from being overly influenced A process heavy straightjacket for organizations that can t figure out how to delegate the rules of communication It is well written and persuasive It is also a dangerous management system that can undermine a company as it did with mine when we tried to implement it It nearly brought us down My takeaway is that there is no system that can replace solid leadership Ifou re the CEO ou need to own it and get to work It s super tempting to abdicate responsibility but it is simply the wrong path to take Yes people make mistakes but applying a straightjacket for decision making process is not the answer The answer is reflection continuous improvement clear roles and autonomy Yes signals might get lost but the answer is not allowing all the noise to go through the same process The answer is to cultivate better signalling and better filters to reduce the noise Yes we sometimes get lost in endless debate but the answer is not to force decisions The answer is to take ownership as the leader to make sensible decisions Yes people need authority in their role But the answer is not to formalize this to a degree that even governments would find cumbersome The answer is to define the role create space within that role for authority and accountability and to keep monitoring performance Instead of this book consider the following High Output Management by Andrew Grove Turn The Ship Around by L Maruet Extreme Ownership By Extreme Ownership by Willink and Leif BabinGood luck Holacracy is a system for structuring a business through peer to peer self organization and distributed control in which we all get to be adults togetherokay so 1 Holacracy doesn t stand up under Marxian analysis Power is not actually being distributed when workers are still selling their labor and the value of their efforts is taken as profit by the business owner2 Holacracy is designed for the perfect rational human without personality relationships or ego It is deliberately designed to create a healthy separation between the personalinterpersonal and the organization Robertson considers this a deeper honoring of the personal by keeping it entirely out of the workplace I mean sure props for being open and honest about the neoliberal wish to erase the messy realities of human behavior and human needs The Holacracy is only concerned with the relationship between roles It is Cision L'holacracy Des réunions clairement ciblées et cohérentes Une structure organisationnelle évolutive Une conception locale et distribuée de l'organisation Une structure claire pour une prise de décision distribuée Je vous recommande vivement cet ouvrage comme bible Holacracy si vous recherchez une nouvelle méthode de travail Tony Hsi. A great example of how self managing organizations can work successfully As a person interested in particular in practical implementations over theoretical possibilities I found the book a great combination of both Even if Holacracy does not fit our organization I recommend the book to everyone who believe in the idea of self managing organizations Many good ideas but for my taste too extreme and too process heavy I like the idea of circles and roles and how autonomy and accountability is shifted I also appreciate the separation of meta level from the operations What I have a hard time with is imagining adults liking being put into a strict process straightjacket I just don t think that process alone will magically cure all problems of modern organizationsHolacracy feels to me like its to teal organization what Scrum is for AgileOverall a decent 35 I was reading a short stories science fiction anthology at the same time and the two books felt interchangeable I had always been interested in aspects of holacracy and reading this book in its entirety demonstrated how off base I was with my assumptionsFor starters most of the world s religions allow ou to practice said faith with flexility Robertson is so
rigid in his it s 110% holacracy or it just won t work that it felt like I wasin his it s 110% holacracy or it just won t work that it felt like I was a cult s doctrine This is where the science fiction aspects come in because much of the book is actually detailing the robotic interactions that holacracy dictates ou have to practice It s not that different from when fiction authors delve into a lot of detail to describe a completely different worldIt s hard to take much away from the book because there doesn t seem to be a lot of substance or evidence to substantiate why the world needs to reorganise in this model You can describe any assortment of interactions but that doesn t make it the right choiceIn the closing chapter Robertson says that it s a natural evolution for organisations to deploy holacracy However unlike biomimicry or another emerging trend there s nothing to indicate that humans behave like this I would only suggest holacracy to organisations that have no purpose in actuality or for social capital purposes who sole aim is profit above all else This book details the coming together of utilitarianism with capitalism In it s focus about the organisation and not people it is at least explicit that all sources of labor are just cogs in a bigger machine I read this book because it was discussed in Reinventing Organizations as a complete system for running things under self organising principles Unlike Reinventing Organizations this book is not intended to be an inspirational guide at least I don t think so Instead it is meant to present the management system that is Holocracy walk us through its elements its processes its systems and help us in deciding if we want to adopt it The great advantage of adopting this management system is that it is fully developed tried testing and mature Attempting to redo this from scratch I think would be ludicrous Then again some aspects of the system may not be appealing to someIn essence it is a management system that replaces the traditi This book does a great job at showcasing Holacracy a new management system that distributes authority and accountability throughout an organization instead of relying on
managers to guide employees What makes this book successful is that it includes both the why and the how to useto guide employees What makes this book successful is that it includes both the why and the how to use all in a digestible readAn aspect of Holacracy dear to me is that unlike current discourse on the matter it doesn t put employees and companies interests back to back Instead it proposes a system in which both personal autonomy and a fierce focus on the company s success are part of the same euationAfter ears of hearing about Holacracy and reading bits and pieces about this rich model here and there I can t recommend this book enough for anyone who wants the full story in one packageDisclaimer I work with HolacracyOne the company developing the Holacracy model Before I start I don t think I m able to properly review this book with reviewing the concept of Holocracy itself It s technically possible but it doesn t make IMHO much senseThe overall concept of Holocracy to replace inefficient troublesome mgmt hierarchies with system of nested circles governed by process itself sounds very crazy but AVANT PROPOS DE BERNARD MARIE CHIUET IGI PARTNERS Le modèle Holacracy a bouleversé mon univers David Allen Voici enfin un ouvrage du créateur de Holacracy ui montre le fonctionnement et la mise en oeuvre de ce nouveau système révolutionnaire de management des entreprises Holacracy est un système très structuré offrant aux gens le pouvoir ,